Glossary

Ad pre-test

Also called copy test · creative pre-test

Evaluating a creative before it runs — likeability, emotion, comprehension, intent, brand attribution. The study format where synthetic earns its keep first.

An ad pre-test evaluates a creative before it runs, on a battery that has barely changed in decades: likeability, emotion, message comprehension, intent, distinctiveness, and attribution to the brand. None of that changes when the respondents become synthetic. Only the clock does.

This is where synthetic quantitative pays off soonest, for a simple reason: pre-testing compares versions. And comparing — ranking, eliminating, ordering — is what a simulated panel is good at, even when it is poor at producing an accurate absolute level.

What reads, and what does not

Reads: the gaps between executions, the objections in the open-ends, where comprehension breaks, which version wins and by how much. Does not read: an absolute likeability score benchmarked against a market norm, or a projection into share. Synthetic steers a choice between creatives; it does not stand in for the measurement that releases a media budget.

What a buyer can check

That the audience is calibrated on the market the ad will run in. That the open-ends are not uniformly warm — no creative has only strengths. And that the reported gaps survive a second run.

For the wider practice, testing headlines, claims and body copy as well as finished ads, see copy testing.

See also

  • Concept test — Putting an idea that still lives on paper — a concept, a product, a name, a promise — in front of its audience, before anything is committed.
  • Synthetic survey — A conventional quantitative protocol — closed questions, segments, weighting — run against a population of synthetic respondents instead of a human panel.
  • Under-dispersion — The commonest defect in simulated panels: answers cluster more tightly than real humans’. Disagreement disappears, and the signal goes with it.

Further reading

Back to the glossary